THIS DATE IN HISTORY: First football game was May 14, 1874
(Photo Credit: Notman Composite Photo, courtesy of ۲ݮƵ University Archives)
MONTREAL -- This week marks the 138th anniversary of the historic ۲ݮƵ-Harvard rugby-football confrontation. The two-game series, played at Cambridge, Mass., May 14 and 15, 1874, were the first formal games of North American-style football.
These contests were preceded by a Princeton-Rutgers football game in 1869 but that event was actually played under England's "Football Association" rules, better known in North America as soccer.
۲ݮƵ's game, which featured an oval ball, permitted kicking the ball as in soccer, but the participants could also pick the ball up and run with it whenever they pleased.
Harvard's syle of play incorporated a round ball and a kicking style of play known as "the Boston game" and was also closely related to what we today call "soccer". However, a curious feature of that game was that a player could run and throw or pass the ball only if he were being pursued by an opponent. When the opposing player gave up pursuit he called out to the runner, who had to stop and kick the ball.
The 1874 ۲ݮƵ-Harvard series, which featured 11 men per side, was played with a round ball and "Boston" rules in the first game. The next day, they played under ۲ݮƵ rules, which included ۲ݮƵ's oval ball and the ability to pick up the ball and run with it.
Some 500 spectators, mostly students, paid 50 cents apiece to watch the teams play and the $250 collected at the gate was used by both teams for a post-game reception and to cover ۲ݮƵ's travelling expenses. The event is recounted by three first-hand sources posted below. One is a reprint of two actual game accounts from The Gazette in Montreal and one from The Harvard Crimson in Cambridge. The other source is from recollections of former ۲ݮƵ student Henry Joseph, who played in that first game, in a piece entitled "How the 1874 ۲ݮƵ-Harvard Football Games Forever Changed Football".
Also posted are the original rules of 1874 ۲ݮƵ Football Club.
Piecing together newspaper clippings and Joseph's very lucid recollections, the story of the first three games of intercollegiate football are as follows:
On May 14, 1874, ۲ݮƵ and Harvard played the first game of intercollegiate football in America on Jarvis Field in Cambridge, Mass.
In the course of time this game has become historical and in a book on the history of Harvard athletics, a painstaking author went to a great deal of trouble to check up all the details of the encounter and to prove groundless all claims that other teams had met before Harvard and ۲ݮƵ.
In the spring of 1874 Harvard announced grave dissatisfaction with the rugby rules under which her inter-faculty teams were playing and decided to send up to ۲ݮƵ in Montreal for a team to play an exhibition match introducing the more orthodox code. Meanwhile, the same idea had occurred to three ۲ݮƵ men. Duncan E. Bowie, R.W.Huntington and David Rodger had often discussed the possibility of challenging the Americans but for one reason or another nothing definite was done.
In the spring of 1874, however, conditions were at last such that a team could make the trip to Cambridge. A “formal but courteous” challenge was sent which fitted in so well with Harvard’s plans that arrangements were completed, almost at once, for a two-game series at Harvard in the spring and a return match in Montreal in the fall.
Years have passed since that first ground of ۲ݮƵ athletes went south and the passing years have brought so many radical changes to rugby football that the new game is no longer recognizable as an outgrowth of the old.
In 1874 the rules were very like those of the game now known as English rugby. In fact, the ۲ݮƵ team, and all other teams in Montreal, played under a code almost exactly similar to that which our rugger players now use.
Teams were generally composed of 15 men to a side, but now and then games were played with as few as 22 men on the field. The game was far from uniform. Each locality introduced strange rulings of its own. Harvard for instance, played a game quite different from that of ۲ݮƵ.
The Canadians had remained loyal to the sport as it had been imported from England. The Americans had already begun to effect certain changes. Of these one of the most confusing was that a man could run with the ball only as long as someone chose to pursue him. When a tackler abandoned the ball-carrier, the latter was forced to kick, pass or even throw away his burden.
The first game was played at 4:00 p.m., before 250 persons. The queer American rules prevailed and the ball was unlike anything which the Canadians had seen before. It was round, uncovered and made of rubber; exactly, in appearance and feel, like the balls which children now use in play.
A contemporary account describes the start like this:
“The officials called the two captains together and tossed a coin to determine the choice of goals. Captain Grant of Harvard, by correctly naming the turn of the coin, set a precedent for all his successors at Harvard. He selected the north-west goal, thereby obtaining the advantage of a slight breeze. Captain Rodger of ۲ݮƵ, who had been carrying his arm in a sling on account of a recent injury, thereupon unconcernedly walked to one of the posts which supported the goal rope, hung his sling upon the post, and called to his players to take the field. The two teams lined up at once.”
When the “warnings” had been given by the officials, ۲ݮƵ kicked off, and the first game of American Intercollegiate football was under way.
The uniforms of the time are interesting as relics of bygone days. Nondescript as inter-faculty teams are today, there is not one of them which would take the field in the outfits worn by the men of ‘74.
No pads of any kind were worn; woollen jerseys covered the torso, while the legs were encased in white trousers, “some long and some short.” Some of the men wore black football turbans-- the ancestor of the modern helmet-- and others white canvass hats.
The Harvard players wore gauze undershirts, full length gymnasium costumes and light baseball shoes. Most of them had handkerchiefs knotted about their heads. The gauze undershirts were worn for reasons of strategy, the idea being that the first tackle would demolish them, leaving slippery human flesh for the next opponent.
Harvard won the game by a score of 3-0. At that time, there was no standard method of scoring points. Certain things, however, were recognized as turning the tide of battle. Crossing the goal-line was one of them and kicking the ball over the goal-posts was another.
Harvard seems to have done at least one of these things, ۲ݮƵ had by far the faster team. Bowie, Huntington and Joseph were all springs and runners of note in Montreal. Bowie was one of the very fast men in Canada at the time, having been credited with a clocking of 10.2 seconds for the hundred yards dash.
Huntington and Joseph were also track men and these three on the half line made things hot for the Harvard defenders time after time. They would get the ball out from the “scrum” and streak across the field, passing as they ran, only to be called back for violations of the American pursuit rule, which was unknown in Canada. According to Mr. Joseph, Harvard’ victory was well earned and their scoring plays resulted from sustained offensive pressure.
On the following day the universities met again, this time under Canadian rules with 13 men to the side. The line-up is very difficult to ascertain. There was no complete list of players in any paper and human memory is so frail that a survivor who was known to have played denied all knowledge of the game when he was asked to name his teammates 30 years after the match.
The game ended in a scoreless draw after two hours of the most strenuous sort of play. ۲ݮƵ had the edge in running and tackling, and with three very fast sprinters in Bowie, Huntington and Joseph would have undoubtedly won had it not been for Harvard’s sheer strength and determination.
That same year, on Oct. 23, 1874, Harvard paid a return visit to Montreal, playing a ۲ݮƵ team on the old Montreal Cricket Grounds, where the Church of St. James the Apostle now stands. Again ۲ݮƵ went down to defeat. The rules had apparently been modified because only nine men took the field and their positions remain unknown, Mr. Joseph being able to speak only for himself and one or two others.
Harvard played superior football. Their attack was faster and more determined, the ۲ݮƵ running halves were collared on each break-away. The pursuit rule had been dropped and ۲ݮƵ had now nothing of which complain. It was Harvard’s game from whistle to whistle.
==============================
Harvard vs ۲ݮƵ - Harvard Wins
(reprinted from The Montreal Gazette
May 15, 1874)
==============================
The long-talked of football match between the ten of ۲ݮƵ
University and the ten of Harvard University took place yesterday
afternoon, on Jarvis Field, Cambridge.
The ۲ݮƵ Club consists of the following members: D. Rodgers,
captain; O’Hara Baynes, G.E. Jenkins, J.S. Hall, J.B. Abbott, R.W.
Huntinden, H. Gilbert, D.E. Bowie, H. Joseph, H.W. Thomas, C.
Thomas and P.J. Goodhue.
The Harvard club is as follows: H.R. Grant, captain; W.R. Tyler, H.
Lombard, A.L. Goodrich, A. Cabot, M. Whitney, W.C. Sanger, F.E.
Randall, H.C. Leeds, H.L. Morse and J. Lyman.
The game commenced shortly before 4 o’clock, and was played in
accordance with the Harvard rules. It was arranged that five
games should be played, the club winning three to be declared the
victor.
(ED. NOTE: IN THIS ERA, A "GAME" WAS GENERALLY ENDED BY ANY SCORING PLAY AND A "NEW" GAME WAS THEN PLAYED, UP TO AN AGREED UPON NUMBER. TEAMS CHANGED ENDS AFTER EVERY "GAME").
At the commencement the Harvards win the choice of goals,
which entitled the ۲ݮƵs to do the first kick, they playing with
the sun directly in their faces. The first game was lively
while it lasted, but in less than five minutes the ball was flying
over the ۲ݮƵ’s goal, and the first game was declared for the
Harvards.
The second was somewhat longer. The Harvards kept the ball
well over on the ۲ݮƵs’ side, and after a sharp contest, during
which both clubs were several times piled up together
indiscriminately, it was again forced over the ropes by the
Harvards.
In the third game there was more desperate struggling, but the
Harvards had it all their own way and again won.
This afternoon a game is to be played at the same place in
conformity to the English or Rugby rules between the same
clubs.
The ball to be used by the ۲ݮƵs is of oval shape, made of
leather, and twice the size of that of the Harvards. The
principal point of difference in this game is that the ball must be
kicked over a cross-bar placed ten feet from the ground between two
upright, fifteen feet high, and that the party catching the ball on
a bound can run with it and retain it until he kicks it or it is
forced from him.
There was an immense crowd of spectators to witness the games
yesterday, and there will be a larger one to-day, when the ۲ݮƵs
will undoubtedly make a better show at their own game.
=====================================================
Another article reprinted from The Montreal Gazette, May 19,
1874:
=====================================================
The team arrived home on Saturday evening in good order, only one
of the number being laid up. Shortly after their arrival in
Boston, the Harvard fellows called on them and exchanged
words.
In the afternoon they went out to Cambridge, but owing to the great
heat only a scratch match was played, six from each side.
Afterwards the Montrealers were invited up by several of the
students into their rooms, and then taken to their club.
Subsequently they went to St. Charles River, and saw the Boat
House, and many of the crews out, especially the fine looking crew
for Saratoga.
Thursday (May 14) was very hot, about 85 degrees in the
shade. The game was played according to Harvard rules.
An immense crowd was present. ۲ݮƵ was beaten.
On Friday (May 15) the team went over to Cambridge, feeling a
little “blue”, but not showing it externally. The crowd was
very much greater.
The ۲ݮƵs lost the toss and had to kick against a fresh easterly
breeze. At the end of half an hour, time was called and goals
changed, neither side victorious. The second half hour the
result was the same, and so for the third. The crowd cheered
impartially, and certainly were very patient to remain standing so
long.
On Friday night the Harvard team entertained the ۲ݮƵ men at a
grand dinner at the Parker House. The ۲ݮƵ team came away
with reluctance; they would have liked to have stayed another week
with the Harvards, they were treated so well and kindly. They
carry home with them the pleasantest recollections of their visit,
and the courtesy and hospitality of their entertainers.
=======================================
THE FOOT-BALL MATCH.
(reprinted from The Harvard Crimson)
Friday, May 22, 1874
=======================================
THE second game of foot-ball between the ۲ݮƵ and Harvard Tens
last Friday was awaited with the greatest impatience, not to say
anxiety, by every one in College.
The game on Thursday had been a disappointment to all who saw it,
for the Canadians, from ignorance of the Harvard rules, had failed
utterly in resisting the Harvard Ten, who won the three goals so
easily that the ۲ݮƵ players seemed standing in the field merely
to be spectators of their opponents' excellent kicking.
But on Friday, when the game was to be played according to the
۲ݮƵ, or rather Rugby rules, it was feared that the result would
be quite different, - that the Canadians would win the match with
little difficulty.
After a half-hour past the time appointed for the beginning of the
game, the ۲ݮƵ men, dressed in the English foot-ball suit,
straggled into the field, and, after a few minutes, were followed
by a shabby-looking set of men, who turned out to be the Harvard
Ten. As it happened, the dilapidated appearance of the Harvard
players was quite a boon to the lookers-on, for if they had been
respectably clad in a uniform of some kind it might have been quite
impossible to distinguish between the two sides; but, as it was,
one merely had to notice whether or not a few rags were floating
gracefully behind the player, to know to which side he
belonged.
Indeed, in the last half-hour, one of the Harvard players had
excited the spectators to the utmost with the hope that he was
about to gain a long-wished-for "touch-down," when one of his
pursuers bethought himself of stretching out his hand and seizing
one of the many pennons that were waving behind him, with which he
drew him skilfully to the ground, awakening in him the same
sensation that a kite has when pulled to the ground by a little
boy.
For the first half-hour the Harvard men had the wind in their
favor. To the agreeable surprise of most of us, the Canadians did
not kick the ball over the cross-bar in the first five minutes, and
they seemed indeed hardly able to hold their own. The first two
half-hours passed without either side winning even a touch-down,
although several times it was barely lost; but the last half-hour
was the most exciting of all.
Both sides were evidently doing their best, though several of the
۲ݮƵ men already showed signs of the rough usage they had
received in the first part of the game. The end of the half-hour
came at last, and the game was drawn.
On the whole it was a very successful contest, and it is to be
hoped that next year several games may be played between the Tens
of ۲ݮƵ and Harvard.
=======================================
Playing Rules of the ۲ݮƵ University Football Club
(reprinted from the ۲ݮƵ University Gazette,
April 1874)
=======================================
Until a few years ago, the methods of playing football were varied
and numerous, but the game has finally settled into two distinct
styles – the Rugby rules and the Association rules.
The object of the Association code is to encourage “dribbling”, and
simplicity has also been carefully studied by the abolition of all
clauses and technicalities calculated to prevent the easy
comprehension of the rules; the Rugby laws are much more
extensive and elaborate, and the main idea is to encourage speed of
foot with a minimum of kicking, besides, there being an atmosphere
of danger in the “hacking” and “mauls” so dear to every player more
Rugbeinsi.
We today publish a copy of the College rules, revised and amended
up to April, 1874, and these will make the chief features of our
game apparent to everyone. They disagree very materially with
the rules of the Canadian Association, and while we regret our
exclusion from playing for the Champion Cup, yet we feel bound,
both by honour and inclination, to stick to our own game, which
seems always to have suited our men peculiarly well.
i. Each goal shall consist of two upright posts,
16 feet high and 15 feet apart, with a cross-bar at a distance of
10 feet from the ground. The maximum length of the ground
shall be 150 yards; the maximum breadth shall be 75 yards.
ii. The number of players on each side shall be
not more than 20, or less than 10. The definite number too be
settled by the Captains before each match.
iii. The winners of the toss shall have the
option of kick off or choice of goals. The game shall be
commenced by a place kick from the centre of the ground, and the
opposite side shall not come within 10 yards of the ball.
iv. The ball shall be kicked off (i.) at the
commencement of the game, (ii.) after a goal has been obtained, or
(iii.) at the end of each half hour.
v. After a goal is won, ends shall be
changed, and the losing side shall kickoff. In the
event, however, of no goal having fallen to either side at the
lapse of half an hour, ends shall then be changed.
vi. The ball may be caught on the bounce and
carried; the player so carrying the ball may be “tackled” or
“shouldered”, but not hacked, throttled, or pommelled. No
player may be held unless in actual possession of the ball.
vii. In the event of any player holding or
running with the ball being tackled, and the ball fairly held, he
may at once cry “have it down”; but he need not do so until his own
side comes up.
viii. A goal can only be obtained by kicking the
ball from the field of play direct (i.e. without touching the dress
or person of any player of either side) over the cross-bar of the
opponent’s goal, whether it touch such cross-bar, or the posts, or
not: but if the ball goes directly over either of the goal posts it
is called a poster, and is not a goal. A goal may be obtained
by any kind of kick except a punt.
ix. A match shall last for three half hours --
it shall be decided by the majority of goals, or in the event of no
goals being obtained by the majority of touch-downs; three
touchdowns counting as one goal.
x. Every player is on side but is put off side
if he enters a scrummage from his opponents’ side, or being in a
scrummage, gets in front of the ball, or when the ball has been
kicked, touched, or is being run with by one of his own side behind
him (i.e. between himself and his goal line). Every player
when off side is out of the game, and shall not touch the ball in
any case whatever, or in any way interrupt or obstruct any player,
until he is again on side.
xi. A player being off side is put on side when
the ball has been kicked by or has touched the dress or person of
any player of the opposite side, or when one of his own side has
run in front of him either with the ball or having kicked it when
behind him.
xii. It is lawful for any player who has the ball
to throw it back towards his own goal, or pass it back to any
player of his own side who is at the time behind him, in accordance
with the rules of on side.
xiii. If a ball goes into touch, the first
player, on his side, who touches it down must bring it to the spot
where it crossed the touch line; or if a player, when running with
the ball, cross or put any part of either foot across the touch
line, he must return with the ball to the spot where the line was
so crossed, and then either (i.) bound the ball in the field of
play, and then run with it, kick it, or throw it back to his own
side, or (ii.) throw it out at right angles to the touch
line.
xiv. The goal line is in goal, and the touch line
is in touch.
xv. If the ball be sent beyond the
side-bounds and put behind the goal line, it shall be touched down
and thrown in from the corner in a diagonal direction by whoever
touches it down.
xvi. It is not lawful to take the ball from off
the ground for any purpose whatever, unless it be in touch.
xvii. No hacking or hacking over, or tripping up,
shall be allowed under any circumstances. No one wearing
projecting nails, iron plates, or gutta percha on any part of his
boots or shoes, shall be allowed to play in a match.
xviii. In case of any distinct and wilful
violation of these Rules of Play, a free kick shall be forfeited to
the opposite side from the spot where the infringement took place,
but in no case shall a goal be scored from such free kick.
xix. Continued transgressions of Rules by any
player, the side to which he belongs shall lose him.
xx. All disputes to be settled by the Umpire,
whose decision shall be final.
Definition of terms
---------------------
1. A “drop kick” is made by letting the ball
fall from the hands and kicking it the very instant it rises.
2. A “place kick” is made by kicking the ball
after it has been placed in a nick made in the ground for the
purpose of keeping it at rest.
3. A “punt” is made by letting the ball fall
from the hands and kicking it before it touches the ground.
SOURCE :
Earl Zukerman
Communications Officer
۲ݮƵ Athletics & Recreation
earl.zukerman [at] mcgill.ca