۲ݮƵ
Past events - 2023
3 February 2023:Reading Stephen Tierney'sThe Federal Contract. A Constitutional Theory of Federalism
In his most recent book,The Federal Contract. A Constitutional Theory of Federalism(Oxford University Press, 2022),Stephen Tierneysuggests a new outlook on federalism as a specific type of constitutionalism. He argues that the fundamental concepts of modern constitutionalism (such as notions of constituent power, sovereignty, and citizenship) must be rethought to consider the pluralism which characterizes federal states. The workshop's participants will interrogate Tierney's work on the basis of their own reflections on Canadian federalism and the particular challenges posed by pluralism in Canada. Does Tierney's theory adequately take into account the realities and challenges characteristic of federations composed of many demoi? These exchanges will take place in the presence of the author.
The event, which was co-organized by the Centre de recherche interdisciplinaire sur la diversité et la démocratie (CRIDAQ) and the Peter MacKell Chair in Federalism, took place onFebruary 3rd, 2023 at۲ݮƵ University's Faculty Club.
1 February 2023: "The Secession Referendum Debate in the UK: Legal and Constitutional Issues" - A Legal Theory Workshop with Professor Stephen Tierney
The Supreme Court of the United Kingdom recently rejected the Scottish government's argument that it had a constitutional right to hold a referendum on secession, without Westminster's approval. The Court notably cited (very selective) excerpts of the Quebec Secession Reference in coming to its conclusion. How did the Court arrive at this decision and what was its constitutional rationale? And what, more broadly, does it tell us about the place of the referendum within devolved or federal systems?This Legal Theory Workshop with Professor Stephen Tierney, co-organized by Professors Johanne Poirier and Joshua Nichols, took place onFebruary 1st, 2023in theCaren and Jordan H. Waxman Common Roomof ۲ݮƵ's Faculty of Law.
Past events - 2021
8 November 2021: "Federalism and the Charter: Rethinking the Connections"
On 8 November 2021, as part of the conference The Charter at Forty, Professors Johanne Poirier and Colleen Sheppard gave an online presentation titled “Federalism and the Charter: Rethinking the Connections”. Programme details for this three-day conference are available on this .
Presentation outline: Federalism and the Canadian Charter are often conceived as being in tension with one another. The Charter is seen as a pan-national document affirming individual (and some collective) rights and imposing uniform values and norms across the country in ways that risk undermining provincial diversity and the multinational character of Canadian federation. Indeed, it is possible to point to cases affirming reproductive rights and same sex equality rights as examples of the Supreme Court intervening to affirm Charter rights at odds with provincial choices. However, there is another strand of constitutional jurisprudence that complicates this traditional narrative. Federalism allows for local innovations and experimentation that have proven critically important for advancing rights and freedoms. Moreover, building on process-based conceptions of constitutionalism, the meaning of rights has also been informed by attentiveness to participation in local democracy, minority empowerment, collective solidarity and self-governance. Examples include linguistic rights, the rights of Indigenous peoples and provincially enacted rights rooted in citizen mobilization. In some contexts, therefore, the affirmation of constitutional rights reinforces a decentralized vision of governance. Rethinking the traditional dichotomy between conceptions of federalism and constitutional rights, therefore, makes possible a more nuanced and complex understanding of the jurisdictional dimensions of justice.
8 June 2021: webinar on the Belgian federation - Primauté au fédéral? Voorrang voor het federale niveau?
On Tuesday 8 June 2021,the Re-Bel Initiative (Re-Thinking Belgian Institutions in a European Context) helda webinar at which Professor Johanne Poirier spoke. The event was in French and in Dutch.
Event description: Belgium’s current federal structure aims to facilitate policy making by allocating exclusive competences to the federal government and parliament on the one hand and to the governments and parliaments of Belgium’s regions and communities on the other. Both levels are sovereign in their respective domains. There is no hierarchy that confers primacy to federal legislation over regional and community legislation, in contrast, for example, with Germany’s federal system, where Bundesrecht bricht Landesrecht is one of the guiding principles.
However, the measures necessitated by the pandemic, the need to honour EU-level commitments on the climate and the controversies over Brussels’ air traffic noise norms and congestion charges led many to question the wisdom of dispensing with such a federal primacy principle. To avoid confusion, delays and blockages, would it make sense to allow the federal level to coordinate regional action, issue binding policy guidelines or even overrule regional and community legislation? In other words, should Belgium establish some form of hierarchy between the federal level and the regional level, possibly under specific conditions, such as emergency situations or the risk of failing to comply with European obligations? Or would this amount to depriving the regions and communities of some of their autonomy without any significant gain in the efficiency of policy making?
Moderation: Béatrice DELVAUX (Le Soir) & Karel VERHOEVEN (De Standaard)
Welcoming: Philippe VAN PARIJS (Re-Bel & UCLouvain)
Introduction: Gwendolyn RUTTEN (Open VLD)
Challenges: Johanne POIRIER (۲ݮƵ University, Montreal), Patricia POPELIER (UAntwerpen), Marc UYTTENDAELE (ULB)
General discussion
Concluding comments: Paul DE GRAUWE (Re-Bel & LSE)
The recording is .
22 February 2021: webinar Boundary or Pandemic Control? Understanding Subnational Border Restrictions to Control COVID19 in Federal Systems
On 22 February 2021,Professor Johanne Poirier participated in a webinar hosted by the Australian Centre for Federalism and the Centre for International and Public Law.
Official event description: This webinar will explore the use (or, non-use) of subnational border restrictions and closures to control the spread of COVID19 in federal systems. Expert panelists from Australia, Canada, the USA, Italy, Argentina, and Brazil will discuss the legal considerations and potential political motives of using subnational borders as a mechanism of pandemic control. The event will be chaired and moderated by Dr Tracy Beck Fenwick, Director of the Australian Centre for Federalism, School of Politics & International Relations, ANU.
Expert Panel Speakers:
- Laureate Professor Cheryl Saunders AO, University of Melbourne Law School, Australia.
- Professor Johanne Poirier, Peter MacKell Chair in Federalism, ۲ݮƵ Faculty of Law, Canada.
- Professor Daniel Beland, James ۲ݮƵ Professor, Director of ۲ݮƵ Institute for the Study of Canada.
- Professor John Kincaid, Professor of Government and Public Service, Lafayette College, Pennsylvania, USA.
- Associate Professor Andre Borges, Institute of Political Science, University of Brasília, Brazil.
- Professor Lucas Gonzalez, CONICET, University of San Martin, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
- Dr Elisabeth Alber, Institute for Comparative Federalism, EURAC, Bolzano, Italy.
This talk was recorded and is .
12 January 2021: Presentation "Intergovernmental Relations in Federal Systems"
Professor Johanne Poirier presentedat the fourth event of the Hanns Seidel Foundation's and 50 Shades of Federalism's collaboratively organized online seminar "Turn on Federalism". The talk, titled "Intergovernmental Relations in Federal Systems", wasmoderated by Anja Richter. The event was held in English, and simultaneous translation in Myanmar was provided.
Regardless of institutional design, all federal systems imply substantial degrees of interaction between federal partners. "Intergovernmental relations" (IGR) refer to the many modalities through which this interaction takes place. They are the essential "oil in the machinery" of every federal system, and as such are ubiquitous. IGR take many shapes and forms. They fluctuate with time and according to policy areas.
In this sense, they are idiosyncratic. This presentation explores the actors in the IGR game as well as the rich catalogue of legislative – and mostly executive-techniques on which these actors rely to structure their relations. IGR waltz between institutionalization and informality, often in an opaque fashion which tends to reinforce the executive branch of each federal partner. How do IGR help systems work better? How have IGR in different federations evolved to deal with contemporary challenges, from growing government-coordination needs to handling emergency situations?
This talk was recorded and is .
Past events - 2020
21 May 2020: webinar on federalism and COVID-19
On May 21, 2020, the Peter MacKell Chair in Federalism and the Groupe de recherche sur les sociétés plurinationales organized a webinar on federalism and COVID-19. With researchers coming from nine federations and quasi-federation (Australia, Belgium, Brazil, Canada, Germany, Italy, South Africa, Switzerland and the United States), this online event outlined, through concise presentations, various federations' responses to the pandemic. It enabled us to draw of parallels between countries, while highlighting approaches specific to each.
The discussion was crisp, informative and stimulating, and gave researchers the opportunity to build connections around the world. A second discussion is planned in a few weeks to deepen the ideas exchanged during the first – and provide well-needed updates.
We were fortunate to hear presentations from the following researchers on their country's situation:
- Italy: Francesco Palermo (EURAC Institute for Comparative Federalism, Bolzano/Bozen)
- Australia: Nicholas Aroney (University of Queensland)
- Germany: Sabine Kropp (Free University of Berlin)
- South Africa: Nico Steytler (University of the Western Cape)
- Belgium: Patricia Popelier (University of Antwerp)
- Brazil: Augustina Giraudy (School of International Service, Washington DC)
- Canada: Mireille Paquet (Concordia University)
- Switzerland: Eva Maria Belser (Institute of Federalism, Fribourg)
- USA: Jennifer Selin (University of Missouri)
Past events - 2019
22 February 2019: The Challenges of Coexistence: Language Policy in Canada
Much has been written recently about language policy in Canada, in light of political developments in provinces like New Brunswick and Ontario, the 50th Anniversary of the Official Languages Act and the announced recognition of Indigenous languages in Canada. The objective of this Symposium is to discuss language policy in Canada, with a particular emphasis on language minorities. The event focuses on Canada’s two official languages and their fate at the federal and provincial levels while also bringing to the fore issues related to other languages present in Canada, including Indigenous languages.See the complete program[.pdf]
Past events - 2018
6 November 2018: Les enjeux constitutionnels entourant la succession royale au Canada
The MacKell Chair is co-organising a Constitutional Moment withPatrick Taillon,Julien Fournier,Catherine MathieuandMark D. Walters.Find out more...
28 March 2018: Metaphors and Constitutional Amendments in Canada and the UK
The MacKell Chair is co-organising a Constitutional Moment withPaul Daly, Professor of Law at the University of Cambridge.Find out more...
Past events - 2017
22 November 2017: Constitution of Canada, 2017: Reinventing the fundamental law of a plurinational State
We held a Constitutional Moment talk with Professor Johanne Poirier (۲ݮƵ U) and Professor Daniel Turp (UdeM), and their students. Find out more.
8-9 June 2017: Fiscal Federalism in Plurinational Societies: Equality and Autonomy
The MacKell Chair participated to the conference at Université du Québec à Montréal.
Find out more... [.pdf]
19 May 2017: 2e Conférence Beetz-Laskin en droit constitutionnel canadien
The MacKell Chair was at the Beetz-Laskin conference to participate on a panel examining Federalism, Cooperation and Amendment, at Université de Montréal's Faculty of Law.
April 2017: Concluding theQuestions approfondies de droit constitutionnel course in Ottawa
Taking place in 2017, the year marking the 150th anniversary of the creation of the Canadian federation, the Questions approfondies de droit constitutionnel course was taught in collaboration by Professors Johanne Poirier (U. ۲ݮƵ) and Daniel Turp (U. de Montréal). The course brought together 26 students from both law faculties.
The primary objective of the course was to “modernize” the Constitution of Canada: regroup its scattered sections (the multiple “constitutional laws” and their annexes) and propose potential modifications, notably to codify certain conventions, or even entrench certain principles. The main idea was to propose a legible, living and contemporary constitutional instrument. After the students drafted together the text of a new (and ficticious) Canadian Constitution [.pdf], the class ended with a simulation of a Constituent Assembly in Ottawa.
March 27, 2017: Constitutional Moment with Cheryl Saunders
The Regroupement Droit, changements et gouvernance welcomed a talk on "" with Cheryl Saunders, Professor Emeritus, University of Melbourne. This event took place in Prof. Poirier's class.
March 23 and 24, 2017: Canadian Federalism and its Future/Le fédéralisme canadien et son avenir
The "Canadian Federalism and its Future: Actors and Institutions" colloquium was organized in the broader context of the 150th anniversary of the Canadian confederation by theGroupe de recherche sur les sociétés plurinationales(GRSP) in partnership with ۲ݮƵ University's Peter MacKell Research Chair on Federalism and the ۲ݮƵ and Laval University faculties of law. Taking place over two days, the conference started at ۲ݮƵ University in Montreal, continued on a train to Quebec City, and ended at the Musée de la civilisation in Old Quebec City. See in Focus online (۲ݮƵ Law's e-monthly).
FILM: The Ways of Reconciliation
A portion of the colloquium took place at ۲ݮƵ University; the other, at the Musée de la civilisation in Quebec City.
Between Montreal and Quebec City, a three-hour "Moving Seminar: The Ways of Reconciliation" took place aboard a train wagon specially chartered for the occasion. Participants (some coming from as far as Australia, Germany and Switzerland) experienced a section of the railway that was so crucial both to the unification of Canada, and to the Canadian colonial undertaking that deprived so many Indigenous peoples of their lands and autonomy.
This unusual setting allowed us to reflect in a very concrete manner on the impact and meaning of federalism for Indigenous Peoples. Simply recognizing the three First Nations territories that the train crossed along this 250-km journey was a significant pedagogical and emotional moment for all travellers.
The symposium brought together Mr. Ghislain Picard, Chief of the Assembly of First Nations of Quebec and Labrador, Professor Janique Dubois, specialist (among others) in governance in Metis communities, and Mr. Ry Moran, director of the National Centre on Truth and Reconciliation (University of Manitoba), and was facilitated by Mr. Daniel Salée, professor of Political Science at Concordia University.
Watch the 48-minute film, “A Moving Seminar: The Ways of Reconciliation:
March 22, 2017: Baxter Competition Symposium
The three finalists of the Baxter Family Competition on Federalism presented their papers at ۲ݮƵ University's Faculty Club in front of many of the jury members who have selected them.
150e anniversaire du Canada: Le moment de faire le point
Johanne Poirier | 20 mars 2017 | Le Devoir
"L'année 2017 marque les 150ans de la fédération canadienne. L’anniversaire ne mérite pas nécessairement une célébration. Mais c’est le moment de faire le point et de lever les tabous.Imaginez des jeunes qui se disent que la coexistence pacifique et les différents modes de réconciliation doivent, aussi, passer par une discussion sur nos valeurs partagées et sur les modalités d’organisation et de partage du pouvoir. Imaginez que le mot «Constitution» ne soit plus un «vilain mot»… ou un somnifère…" ...
February 24, 2017: Constitutional Moment with Naomi Metallic
The Regroupement Droit, changements et gouvernance welcomes a talk on «Revitalisation des langues autochtones et réconciliation: urgence d’agir» with Naomi Metallic, Assistant Professor andChancellor's Chair in Aboriginal Law and Policy at the Schulich School of Law, Dalhousie. .
Past events - 2016
November 25, 2016: Vers un esprit sain en partage des compétences ? Normativity in Health and Criminal Jurisdictions in Canada
A Constitutional Moment talk with Professor Alana Klein, Faculty of Law, ۲ݮƵ University. Kindly note this talk takes place at Université de Montréal.
This year, the Matinées constitutionnelles / Constitutional Moments series, which is co-organised by ۲ݮƵ Law and the Centre de droit public de l’Université de Montréal (RDCG), will be devoted alternatingly to federalism and linguistic rights.
Time, place: 11h30, Salon François-Chevrette, Université de Montréal. Find out more...
October 28-29, 2016, Ottawa - Constitutional Politics in Multinational States
A Groupe de recherche sur les sociétés plurinationales conference, organized by André Lecours (Ottawa U.), Johanne Poirier (۲ݮƵ U.) and Guy Laforest (Laval U.)
See the program and the project description [.pdf]. This conference is closed to the public, but interested persons can contact the Chair.
October 26, 2016, ۲ݮƵ: Gestion de l’immigration et politiques d’intégration dans des Etats fédéraux : Belgique et Canada
A MacKell Chair in Federalism Conference with Catherine Xhardez, PhD Candidate at Sciences Po Paris. Discussant: Daniel Weinstock.
Time, place: 12:30-14:00, NCDH 316. Find out more...
November 16, 2016, ۲ݮƵ: The Impact of BREXIT on Linguistic Issues in the EU
A Constitutional Moment talk with Stéphanie Chouinard, postdoctoral researcher and lecturer, Faculté de droit, Université de Montréal.
Time, place: 12:30-14:00, NCDH 201. Find out more...
April 6, 2016
PAPILLON, Martin, «Le fédéralisme est-il un modèle viable de gouvernance autochtone?», Faculty of Law, ۲ݮƵ.
March 31, 2016
LEVRAT, Nicolas, «Gouvernance européenne et migration», Faculty of Law, ۲ݮƵ, in collaboration with the Oppenheimer Chair.
March 16, 2016
LEVRAT, Nicolas, “The Impact of Globalisation on Multinational Federations”, Les Matinées constitutionnelles, Faculty of Law, ۲ݮƵ, in collaboration with Centre de recherche en droit public () at Université de Montréal.
Past events - 2015
December 8, 2015
TOMKIN, Adam (Edinburgh University), “Britain’s Territorial Constitution: Can The Union Hold?”.
November 23, 2015
WELDON, Laurel (Purdue University), “Gendered Federal Systems:
Informal Institutions, Intersectionality and Change”, (co-organized with the Annie MacDonald Langstaff Workshop), Faculty of Law, ۲ݮƵ.
October 26-27, 2015
VINTRO, Joan (Faculté de droit, Université de Barcelone), «Les bases juridiques et politiques de l’accession d’une Catalogne indépendante à l’Union européenne».
August 11, 2015
World Federalist Movement - Canada, in collaboration with the ۲ݮƵ Center for Human Rights and Legal Pluralism: “From Global to Local: the Importance of the UN Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples to Reconciliation in Canada", by Senator Murray Sinclair, the former Chair of the Truth and Reconciliation Commission.