ÎÛÎÛ²ÝÝ®ÊÓƵ

Peer Reviewed Conference Proceedings

Ìý

  1. Royle, P., Drury, J.E., Perlitch, I., Fromont, L., & Steinhauer, K. (2016).ÌýStimulus lists can modulate semantic priming effects on the N400.ÌýInternational Journal of Psychophysiology,Ìý108, 89.
  2. Fromont, L. A., Royle, P., Perlitch, I., & Steinhauer, K. (2016). Re-evaluating the dynamics of phrase-structure processing using Event Related Potentials: the case of syntactic categories in French.ÌýInternational Journal of Psychophysiology,Ìý108, 86.
  3. Kasparian, K., Vespignani, F., & Steinhauer, K. (2014). The case of a non-native-like first language: ERP evidence of first language (L1) attrition in lexical and morphosyntactic processing. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 94(2), 159-160.
  4. Steinhauer, K. (2014). Learning and forgetting languages—An introduction to ERP approaches. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 94(2).
  5. ​Royle, P., & Steinhauer, K. (2014). Component changes in ERP profiles during language acquisition. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 94(2).
  6. Courteau E, Royle P, Gascon A, Marquis A, Drury JE, Steinhauer K. (2013). Gender concord and semantic processing in French children: An auditory ERP study. In S Baiz, N, Goldman & R Hawkes (Éds.), Proceedings of the 37th Annual Boston University Conference on Language Development. (Vol. 1, pp. 87-99). Boston: Cascadilla.
  7. Drury, J.E. & Steinhauer, K. (under revision). Brain potentials for logical semantics: (In)definiteness & NPI-Licensing. Experimental Pragmatics (XPrag2007) Proceedings. Berlin.
  8. Mah, J., Goad, H., Steinhauer, K. (2006). The trouble with [h]: Evidence from ERPs. In: O’Brien, M.G. (ed.), GASLA-2006 Proceedings, 80-87. Somerville, MA, USA: Cascadilla Proceedings Project.
  9. Steinhauer, K. & Ullman, M.T. (2002). Consecutive ERP effects of morpho-phonology and morpho-syntax. Brain and Language, 83, 62-65.
  10. Ullman, M.T., Estabrooke, I., Steinhauer, K., Brovetto, C., Pancheva, R., Ozawa, K., Mordecai, K., & Maki, P. (2002). Sex differences in the neurocognition of language. Brain and Language, 83, 141-143.
  11. Steinhauer, K., Alter, K., & Friederici, A.D. (1999). Are commas equivalent to prosodic boundaries? - Evidence from brain potentials. In S. Bagnara (Ed.): Proceedings of the European Conference on Cognitive Science (ECCS), Siena, Italy, (pp. 357-362). Roma: Instituto di Psicologia – Consiglio Nazionale delle Ricerche.
  12. Alter, K., Meyer, M., Steinhauer, K., Friederici, A.D. & Cramon, D.Y. (1999). Brain responses to prosodic information in natural speech: An event-related fMRI study. Proceedings of the34th Colloquium of Linguistics (FASK'99).
  13. Steinhauer, K., Alter, K., & Friederici, A.D. (1999). Prosodic properties, perception, and brain activity. Proceedings of the 14th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences (ICPhC), San Francisco: Regents of the University of California (CDROM).
  14. Alter, K., Steinhauer, K. & Friederici, A.D. (1998). De-accentuation: Linguistic environments and prosodic realizations. In R.H. Mannell & J. Robert-Ribes (Eds.) Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Spoken Language Processing,Ìý Vol. 3, (pp. 551-554). Canberra, Australia: Australian Speech Science & Technology Association (ASSTA).
  15. Steinhauer, K., Alter, K., & Friederici, A.D. (1998). Don’t blame it (all) on the pause: Further ERP evidence for a prosody-induced garden-path in running speech. Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Spoken Language Processing, Vol. 5, (pp. 2187-2191). Canberra, Australia: Australian Speech Science & Technology Association (ASSTA).

Invited Commentaries

  1. Steinhauer, K. (2006). How dynamic is second language acquisition? Applied Psycholinguistics.

Ìý

Back to top